Thursday July 12, 2018 at 10:17am
Helen Hart, Regulatory Affairs Manager, IPMThe ASA has ruled this week on two 'winning moments' or algorithmic promotions, which have excited some controversy in recent months across various sections of the media. The complaints were upheld in relation to both promotions. The adjudications were made under the existing rules of the CAP Code, which set out principles and the ASA then interpreted the principles, assessing each complaint on its merits. This full article is available to IPM Members only, click here to keep reading.To find out about IPM Membership benefits, including access to articles like this, click here.... Read More..
Thursday July 12, 2018 at 10:02am
Helen Hart, Regulatory Affairs Manager, IPMWe are well into a summer of sport with the World Cup,Wimbledon and the Athletics World Cup, among others - and we're getting intomusic festival season too. The IPM has seen a number of ‘win tickets’-stylebrand activations in the marketplace. While this can seem a great opportunityto give consumers access to these kind of events, promoters should beware. It is not necessarily a breach of the CAP Code to give awayprizes without the brand owner's consent or knowledge, but unlike television,tickets or vouchers are a service and constitute a contract, and so will betreated differently in law. This full article is available to IPM Members only, click here to keep reading. To find out about ... Read More..
Thursday September 7, 2017 at 11:52am
Describing social media as the “wild west” of advertising isa tired old cliché. But despite advances in technology, regulation and consumerunderstanding, it’s true that social media allows almost anyone to run a competitionor prize draw. As the BBC reported this week, some consumers are being scammed through illegallotteries, and it’s not uncommon for bloggers and small companies to offerprizes they struggle to fulfil. Even big brands can find themselves caught upin PR disasters – I’m sure Walkers would preferwe forget the sight of Gary Lineker waving a picture of Fred West all overTwitter.Stories like these can make both consumers and brands waryof social media. So what steps can you take to ensure your promotions stand outas ones you can trust?&... Read More..
Friday June 30, 2017 at 9:18am
Laura Kelly, the IPM's Regulatory Advisor, talks about the CAP Code changes that come into force on 1st July 2017. I'm taking the top blog spot today with my summary of what you need to know about the CAP Code changes that affect the way we promote HFSS (high fat, salt or sugar) products to children and families. These changes are a result of industry-wide consultation and represent a significant shift in the way responsible promoters want to market their brands. Agencies need to understand the impacts on campaign planning and make sure they take into account the changes when considering campaigns around HFSS brands. Below I've summarised the key facts that you need to know now. There are of course many more questions you might need answers for, so get in touch with us over at th... Read More..
Friday April 14, 2017 at 3:32pm
CAP has published new guidance on non-broadcast ad placement. Protecting children and young people is at the core of the advertising rules and the work carried out by CAP. The IPM as part of the CAP Committee, fully supports the new guidance issued.The guidance helps the marketers of age-sensitive products to abide by our media placement rules. Ads for age-restricted products and services must not appear in media:for children (under-16s) or children and young people (under-18s); and where children or children and young people make up a significant proportion – more than 25% – of the audience. Alcohol and gambling have long been subject to such rules. Recently, a media placement restriction was put in place for electronic cigarette advertising and, from July th... Read More..